Trigger warning: Description of a disturbing circumcision research on babies and some ugly descriptions of Victorian ‘preventions’ against masturbation following. You can safely skip down to “The left’s mania for kiddie genital mutilation” which contains only general discussion of bottom surgery and the newer adoption of ‘eunuch’ identity.
Where did the psychopath transactivists of WPATH and elsewhere get the idea that it’s okay to mutilate children’s genitals with ‘bottom surgery’? Why from humanity, of course, and its historical hate-on for human sexuality in all its forms.
Female Genital Mutilation may be especially pernicious, existing only to prevent female sexual pleasure, but MGM reduces male sensitivity to sexual pleasure and is performed often when a child is too young to consent.
Why do we still allow this? How is this not the ultimate barbarism?
If Female Circumcision Is Wrong, Why Not Male?