When Will They Start Trans-ing Smart Girls And Dumb Boys?

Because when Queen Elizabeth I is mis-transed, today's intellectually non-conforming children can't be safe from stereotyping sex changes

Time to put her on puberty blockers! The only explanation for her is that she’s really a boy! Public domain image on Pxhere

While it’s unacceptable ever to ‘misgender’ a deluded living person who thinks they’re the opposite sex (or no sex at all), it’s perfectly legitimate in the trans cult to misgender dead people.

I was wildly offended when a then-Twitter trending discourse suggested Queen Elizabeth I, Louisa May Alcott and others were ‘trans’.

Because, you know, it’s simply not possible for a chickie-boo like Lizzie to be a powerful, competent, confident leader whose first agenda item after ascending the throne was to pull England back from economic ruin. Not to mention bringing—who’da thunk this from a female leader???—a 44-year reign of peace to England and Ireland. She even got the damn Catholics and Protestants to stop killing each other, although it resumed after she died. (Blame a dude, James I, who then went on to revise the Bible.) She defeated the Spanish Armada—the Spanish Armada, fer crissakes!—and patronized world exploration and the arts.

While it’s quite questionable she was a lasting ‘Virgin Queen’, she had love affairs with her courtiers, but her modern genderqueer detractors theorize Queen Elizabeth was trans, a ‘transman’, or at the very least ‘non-binary’. Because, come on, a girly can’t run a couple of countries all by her pretty little self, can she?

It’s simply inconceivable for the gender-addled for a woman to be that accomplished. Only a man, or a woman ‘born in the wrong body’, infused with a man’s warrior spirit, could be as successful and historically iconic as Queen Elizabeth.

Then there’s the curious case of Louisa May Alcott, a suspiciously lesbian and feminist American literature icon who has been ‘transed’ by the living because she often wished she’d been born a male and claimed she felt, “I am more than half-persuaded that I am, by some freak of nature, a man’s soul put into a woman’s body.”

Alcott was an outlier for sure; she never married, had close friendships and possibly a relationship or two with men several years younger than herself, but unlike certain other female literary icons, left behind no passionate communications with other women. Her most famous literary character, Jo March, was a ‘tomboy’ in modern parlance; headstrong and assertive and would rather write than take care of children. Jo was based on Alcott herself, of course. Alcott deliberately annoyed her chick-lit fans by refusing to let Jo marry Laurie, the handsome young man in love with her. Instead Alcott married her off to an older, bearded, decidedly unsexy man called Professor Bhaer.

It’s glaringly obvious that growing up in the highly strictured Victorian culture may have inclined women like Alcott to long to have been born male simply so they could be free to live the full, rich, and less restrained lives men did. After all, men weren’t excoriated for not getting married and making babies, if they chose to sail the seven seas or seek adventure in African jungles. If Alcott was in fact a lesbian—who “always had more sympathy for & interest in them [males] than in girls,” she may not have had the understanding or vocabulary to verbalize what she was truly feeling—“I’m a woman but I fancy women more than men.” Perhaps wanting to be a man was how it felt if you had no idea what a lesbian was. Or maybe she just wanted the freedom.

I can understand the latter theory. This is one reason why I had such an aversion to dresses growing up. My parents loved dressing up their little living doll when I was a toddler and I have vague memories of enjoying it, especially for church with my bonnet and gloves—“Mommy, I can’t go to church without my glubs!’ When I entered grade school I was forever enjoined to not get dirty or mess up my dress, but no one worried about the boys’ clothes.

The message was clear: Boys had more fun and freedom. Dressing like a girl was the exact opposite. Dresses were stupid.

Trans-ing the stereotypes

It’s well-established now that for all their pretensions to ‘queering the normies’, Trans World abhors real gender rebels, not the pretenders in service to the cult. They misgender the rebels who traditionally and historically defied gender stereotypes, the strong, capable women, the chicks with brains, and the men who dared to be soft and feminine, who didn’t care to build cathedrals or trouble themselves with athletics or military pursuits.

The Facebook group Transing The Dead takes to task the Rainbow Gang revisionists who comb the annals of history seeking to bolster their bogus sex-changing narratives with ‘examples’ of mavericks, deviants, bohos, and dissenters who didn’t live the strictly gendered lives of their peers.

Oscar Wilde wasn’t gay; there’s no such thing as homosexuality in TransWorld; just people who are unacceptably attracted to the wrong sex until they’re ‘properly’ fixed by doctors to love the opposite sex as God and Fred Phelps intended.

Sorry, Kurt, you’re not safe either!

Fun historical non-fact: Leo was a narcissist whose greatest painting was a self-portrait.

I find it repulsive that people get fired for properly gendering living people who can’t change their sex but get a bogus certificate from the government saying they have, yet get away scot-free with misgendering people who are no longer alive to defend themselves.

“Fuck off, you pseudo-bitches! I like chicks, not dicks!” - Louisa May Alcott

“Why do you think I need a vagina? What’s so terrible about riding the Hershey Highway?” - Alan Turing

Homosexuals are being erased from history and modernity just as women are in Trans World.

It leads me to wonder if and when the Next Great Transition Craze will commence—for children, of course.

What’s the deal with those ‘smart girls’ and ‘dumb boys’?

In accordance with the traditionalist, right-wing, uncritical acceptance in Trans World that women are actually created to be dumbly submissive to men and cater to their every whim, it is a truth universally acknowledged, that a woman in possession of a brain, desire, ambition, and motivation, must be in want of a de-sexing.

She was born in the wrong body.

As is a man or boy who doesn’t do well in school, nor talk and think about sports and beer, who never aspires to resolve once and for all how the universe will end. If he fills his head with ‘silly little things’ like fashion, he must really have been meant to be a woman.

Is this the next phase of trans-ing the world? Restoring males firmly back in intellectual jobs and women back at home and hearth where they belong? I have to wonder.

Maybe, instead of trying to drag more girlies into STEM fields, we should turn them into boys instead! Because boys are good at math and science, and girls are good at—doing what they’re told. Being ‘good’. Not fretting their pretty little heads about finances and inventing a better mousetrap. Boys with fluffy brains need to be ‘fixed’ so they can become good, compliant little handmaids.

Smart, capable chicks and kind, genteel guys are freaks.

Historical figures like the equally brilliant Queen Elizabeth and Alan Turing challenge gender stereotypes and remind us not all girls like pink nor are made of sugar and spice; neither are all boys made of snips and snails or like rassling in the dirt with their mates.

While I was never surprised, as some are, to find how misogynist ‘progressive’ politics are, I’ll admit I’ve been hornswoggled in the last few years at discovering in progressivism classic, right-wing homophobia.

If it was obvious to others, it wasn’t to me. Especially not on Team Rainbow, which was formed, fer pete’s sake, to fight for gay rights when police attacked public bathhouses back in the day (and which would eventually be destroyed not by the law but by the AIDS epidemic).

No, I had no idea the far left hated gayfolk so much they were willing to ‘trans’ even small children showing clear signs of homosexuality before they were in pre-school.

The woke left, it seems, are not so unlike their compatriots on the far right.

And they manage to stereotype non-conformers worse than Team MAGA ever has.

The Christian right has long sought to ‘convert’ gay kids through ‘Christian’ counseling, but at least they never went so far as to advocate sex change and attack their genitals. Not since the Victorian period, anyway.

As the far left marches into oblivion (which may come sooner with one helluva backlash if the trans-aversive and now assassination attempt hero Donald Trump wins in November), the transgender medical profession must be scrambling to make as much money as they can from 'transing’ children who fail to conform to stereotypes.

And surely, a little girl who aspires to become a CEO is really asking to become a male, right? Since how could a silly woman possibly become successful and make billions if she wasn’t a man?

“That’s a MAN, baby!” CC BY-SA 2.0 from Wikimedia Commons

The drive to return society to a more traditional world may differ somewhat in vision for the right and left, but both are navigated by misogynist men, embodied on the left by the heterosexual autogynephiles who ultimately want women to stop with their bullshit and grant them sexual satisfaction by accepting them completely as women, and ultimately to do what they’re told without complaint.

Just like their Christian friends on the right. So it goes, as Kurt Vonnegut used to say.

When I’m not operating a secret lab in my hall closet seeking a way to ‘cure’ wokeness and transactivist misogyny (maybe with an RFID chip implanted in their brains at night) I help women and others reclaim their power (and, if necessary, their birth sex) here at Grow Some Labia.