We are seeing today why most of the Witch trials and hangings occurred in history. Witches exist as we see now, sexually-mutilating children's minds-bodies-souls and mothers and State that threw away the one part that can Love in full measure - fathers and brothers and husbands and sons - protecting her and the children from professional insane-evil psycho-women and the children's own slimy back-stabbing delusional baby-murdering mothers and women .. with 1/3 parental fraud and more then 40% false rape allegations and ever-increasing insanity riased from crib, insanity 'accepted' and praised.
We know most of the Witch trials were legitimate because such Witches do exist, less back then because we knew that is it safest for all when they in ground after public warning display of their Wages of Sin .. we know because Satan and the Witch minions are everywhere, with average 60 a day per State of babies silently screaming being tortured to death by them on our F-ing evil-accepting mothers.
What? One more generation and those once innocent beautiful little girls with Witch mothers and no honest real Love, because no fathers, so little baby girls will age to 25 and then their human skin will fall-off and the demon-form that sickened and ate her soul with psycho-0cnt mom's help will walk among-us and be as accepted as our mothers killing our babies is accepted today.
No, the medieval witch trials were not legitimate. Women could not curdle milk in the cow, cause a baby to die with spells or control the weather. The Malleus Maleficarum was written by two angry incels with active imaginations and zero understanding of the Scientific Method (although in their defence it wouldn't be invented for another century or so).
But...plenty of men are involved in this genderfuck insanity so let's give credit where credit is due. and the 40% false rape allegation is delusional.
There's a lot of moral sickness going around, and *no one* is immune.
Do you hope we can all #BelieveWomen when good police investigations find that over 40% are shown as false-rape allegations, which is the low number - the police cannot prove false when she accuses because of regret, punishment, alibi for infidelity, or any of the many that come down to 'She accuses, he claims she consented.' [See other comment for study citation]
We can look at mothers' life-crippling lies to all family and real father, all the people she professes to 'love', with parental fraud at 1/3 - 1/3 children are bastards ..
"The only significant insight into the number of paternity fraud victims
comes from the American Associations of Blood Banks which, year after
year, reports that approximately twenty-eight percent of all paternity tests
exclude the targeted man. [51]"
51. American Association of Blood Banks Annual Report Summary for 1999 reports that “the overall exclusion rate for 1999 was 28.2% for accredited labs.” Id. at 4. The Annual Report Summary for testing in 2003 reports that, “For the laboratories tracking exclusions, there were 353,387 cases completed and 99,174 (28.06%) were reported as exclusions.” Id. at 4. See also, Tresa Baldas, Parent Trap? Litigation Explodes over Paternity Fraud, NAT’L L.J., Apr. 10, 2006 (“According to a recent study in New Hampshire, as many as 30 percent of those paying child support are not the biological fathers of the children being supported.”)
Women that will lie life-crushing lies to everyone she professes to 'love' at rates of 1/3 mothers and so 1/3 of women in Parental Fraud, we should still believe that kind of vile-lying-backstabbing species about rape-accusations targeting not a 'loved' one, but some man she would likely and often does send to hell for the rest of his life for .. some kind of sick inhuman driven craving for crushing a life because maybe she doesn't have one of our son's unborn baby to torture to death?
So, and personal experiences are that too many I suffered .. if they were men and decent men would throw him off a building because that level of putrid vileness is a person is a danger to us all. And so, because it's a woman we let such live-one with tasering them till pissing and screaming in public and throwing in jail for 2+ years?
I'm curious as to what you think about my suggestion on your other comment speculating that men could start suing women for rape allegations unsupported by a police report or evidence. As I write this I consider that it could cut down on problems like the Substack writer rape allegation because, if a woman tries to shame a man or ruin his career publicly, he may have recourse to sue her. (Hmmmm....I may have an article idea here!) It would hold women more accountable for their unsupported allegations (I won't call them lies unless it's demonstrated it was, or she admits it...I believe a lot of those women are telling the truth but they still need to handle it responsibly from a legal standpoint), and also teach them that they have to report even if they don't pursue anything for the moment, if ever. Of course, women could file false reports with the police so they can cover themselves later and I don't have an answer to that yet. But, food for thought. What do you think? You're a very angry man about this and I get it. What can you/we do to rectify these injustices against men?
Correct, if the police only found that a little more then 40% of the filed rape accusations were false in those 3 years, then surely it is higher when no physical proof exists.
Thank you for pointing that out, but I figure you and readers would know.
McDowell, C., “False Allegations,” 11 Forensic Science Digest, NO. 4, (Dec. 1985) p. 64 U.S. Air Force, Office of Special Investigations, Washington, D.C.
Shit, I just spent like half an hour typing a reply to this and then accidentally shut down the tab. I do wish Substack would warn you about that when you're in the middle of a comment. Anyway, to sum up...I checked out your articles and briefly, the Kanin article is very old and cites very old research that doesn't really hold up any more...mostly because of age and dated rape investigation techniques. Another article said that '41%' of rapes were reported from a sample in a 'small metropolitan area', and not all were proven rapes. I should note that *my* definition of a false rape is one that has been demonstrated to be false or the victim finally admits she made it up. I know that false rapes happen; i've known two women who did lie, one of whom lied about two different men. I collect genuine false rape stories to challenge feminists when needed; your article about the situation between McNamara and Lawrence will get added, but still, not proof of the high number of false allegations. The best one you had was the last one from 2017 and, I admit, a little suspicious coming from a men's right's activist group but still, the article was interesting. However, once again, it can't make a good case for a hard and fast 40% of false allegations. They're often found to be 'unfounded' which still isn't proof. The numbers I've usually seen 2%-10% - may in fact be higher but the standard should be proof that the woman lied, and also, some guy got accused. Like the poor schmuck in the U of VA false rape case.
There are a lot of allegations of rape made well after the fact and to those I shrug and say, maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. A few years ago someone made such an allegation about a prominent Substack writer here and I investigated it and wrote about it but I couldn't determine whether she was telling the truth or not, but she still did some harm to this guy without a police report or any evidence. I've often said that women need to preserve the evidence at the time - if they decide to report later, they'll be in a better position than if they just come forward and fill out a report with no evidence. If women want rape victims to be taken more seriously, they're simply going to have to report at the time and if nothing is done about it, that's on the police.
I'm not convinced the false rape rate is that high but the last article, anyway, provided some food for thought and I thank you. I've written about false allegations before (and false false allegations re the feminist deniers of the Hamas mass rapes on Oct 7) and if there's newer evidence that the rape rate is higher than we think, *with evidence*, I want to know about it. I do believe women who lie about rape should be punished as seriously as convicted rapists.
Sorry about that loss of work. I moved from mainframe computer programming to IBM-PC & clones back in mid-1980 when automatic saves did not exist because most files saved on a floppy-drive and slow, pausing entire computer, and no battery back-up and system would reboot on the near-by co-workers flatulence, so .. freq. manual back-up and go pee or watch the giant Cain toads that we kept in lab to get the muscles from, for research ..
About delayed accusations. The law should be if not reported with 6 months it is assumed false witnessing, and some significant punishment. Also, not shielding accuser and her victim only made public with her - predator's name included, and only if more then only her testimony as proof. And 'rape kits' are not so named, they are 'had sex kits' and do not prove rape.
and Canadian Politian Patric Brown after he won his party's run-off and was falsely accused to remove him and allow the meritless Losser women take his place, his entire life has been covered in female-lying feces so some waaman could run for PM ..
He was forced to drop-out even those she had no proof.
--
But women that will lie life-crushing lies to everyone she professes to 'love' at rates of 1/3 mothers and so 1/3 of women in Parental Fraud, we should still believe that kind of vile-lying-backstabbing species about rape-accusations targeting not a 'loved' one, but some man she would likely and often does send to hell for the rest of his life for .. some kind of sick inhuman driven craving for crushing a life because maybe she doesn't have one of our son's unborn baby to torture to death?
So, and personal experiences are that too many I suffered .. if they were men and decent man would throw him off a building because that level of putrid vileness in a person is a danger to us all. And so because it's a woman we let such live-one with tasering them till pissing and screaming in public and throwing in jail for 2+ years?
From wikipedia "Drag is a performance of exaggerated femininity, masculinity, or other forms of gender expression, usually for entertainment purposes.".
My problem with drag for kinds is the exaggeration of gender expression. I think kids should learn/internalise the non-exaggerated gender expressions before they can be introduced to the exaggerations. If they are constantly exposed to the exaggerations before they have a stable core of normal gender expressions, they will have an impression that you need to do those exaggerated expression to be that gender and thus gender identity crysises might happen and they might think that their gender does not match the sex because they don't do those exaggerated gender expressions. Thus the modest gender expressions dissapear.
I don't have a problem with a man wearing modest dresses or skirts and just reading a story without needing to point out to their gender expression. Basically being a man who just happen to wear a skirt. And heck In eastern cultures men wear skirt looking stuff like sarong and no one bats an eye there.
Though my confusion might also stem from my lack of gender identity and it not making sense to me. I don't get why one behaviour/look is deemed feminine while another is deemed as masculine. I see both being able to be done by both males and females. Especially when things change over time, like a few hindreds years ago pink was boys colour while blue was girls colour.
And i think drag kings are ignored as they don't garner much outrage/attention due to masculinity in females being so accepted that people usually don't bat an eye on it. While femininity in males is still seen as outrageous.
I also kinda don't get the whole "perverts in toilet" stuff as there can also be same sex perverts. There is also a dilemma of being a parent with a small child of the opposite sex, do you bring your child to your sex toilet or to their sex toilet? So i am for gender neutral toilets.
We need a major correction - world-wide, and if it takes WWIII nuke war killing 3+ billions to break the insanity and Satanic hold on the survivors -that is as acceptable as the est. 3+ billions of our aborted daughters and sons world-wide in my lifetime. And a Just sacrifice in balance of dead born to match the silently screaming tortured to death unborn in my life.
Before Modernist anchorless deconstruction of sanity started there was St. Thomas Aquinas and other Theologians explaining in rational terms why sin damages the intellect, judgement, prudence, memory, .. the lie that the evil is good cripples us.
So, if sin retards and twists our minds, how much more does being forced from crib to accept the insanities of today as acceptable, even praiseworthy? We are all mind-raped and every generation is more evil-blinded, sexual mutilation of children is Ok, what next? Support of 16 moths of mass murder genocide in middle east?
Back in sane times the wise and experienced knew that what you did in private can hurt us all, and disOrdered perversions seem okay, then turn into almost naked men with strap-ons reenacting demonic-sickening acts in public, in our and children's faces and if a mob rightly publicly hangs them all, the Satanic State and rabid baby-murdering insane women seek to kills them, instead of only the daily crushing of gonads the hating-horrors find acceptable.
Our world in so Sickening Feminized only the death of 3+ billions can break the demonic possession of our putrid-rotted soul womanhood, gov., schools, ... Let them burn, burn, nuke-fire burn - to break the insanity.
Drag Queen reading to children - 30 years ago or whenever first suggested was the time to chain those witches to all the adults in their blood-line and dragged to gobs of not-silent scream flesh in public, or was in 60 years ago needed?
If not, how to stop this slide into hell were dead by nukes better for us and our children then another year of you hate-filled joy-love-hope murdering drive deeper into your psychotic Hell?
We may get the 'correction' sooner than you expect (watch for my article on The Fourth Turnign next week). It may well be global war, or thermonuclear war...I'd really it rather not be the latter two, as a lot of needless decent, innocent lives will be taken. I don't know how it's going to end but the next several years are going to be pretty rough for sure.
BTW the 'masculinized' world we've been living in for the past 12,000 years hasn't worked so well either...so, maybe the peace that comes after the crisis could incorporate more of both? No one group should be allowed to run the whole damn world--and that includes the Penis Brigade which is done a downright gawdawful job of engineering a world that works best for men. How about a world in which people take responsiblility for themselves as well as others?
Good points, all. I think drag kings are also ignored for the same reason transmen garner only a small fraction of the attention transwomen do: They're a lot less controversial and they tend not to recruit and indoctrinate children. I think a lot of them also were just trying to avoid living female in a misogynist world (a very bad reason, but whatever) and don't have a political motivation.
A lot of transactivists very much have a political motivation: Destroying women's right to say no to male sexual pleasure.
I'd rather have third toilets. Yeah, there are gay molesters (it happened to a friend of mine when he was a kid) but allowing men into women's rooms on the false pretense that 'they're women now' gives female-attracted sex offenders an excuse to be there.
It's an interesting quandary for certain. There are so many layers of culture and belief slurried on top that it's super hard to have a rational conversation.
“The overly inclusive progressive movement can’t say no to anyone.” Thank you. This pretty much says it all. What has happened to subtlety of thought? Why is everything so black and white? Why can’t more people support people with differences without putting them on a pedestal as victims of oppression? Why can’t other people be tolerant of others without demonizing them? Why does one side, as you have pointed out, say yes to everyone and everything, while the other side says no to everything and everyone?
Are humans as a whole even capable of balance? I wonder.
We are seeing today why most of the Witch trials and hangings occurred in history. Witches exist as we see now, sexually-mutilating children's minds-bodies-souls and mothers and State that threw away the one part that can Love in full measure - fathers and brothers and husbands and sons - protecting her and the children from professional insane-evil psycho-women and the children's own slimy back-stabbing delusional baby-murdering mothers and women .. with 1/3 parental fraud and more then 40% false rape allegations and ever-increasing insanity riased from crib, insanity 'accepted' and praised.
We know most of the Witch trials were legitimate because such Witches do exist, less back then because we knew that is it safest for all when they in ground after public warning display of their Wages of Sin .. we know because Satan and the Witch minions are everywhere, with average 60 a day per State of babies silently screaming being tortured to death by them on our F-ing evil-accepting mothers.
What? One more generation and those once innocent beautiful little girls with Witch mothers and no honest real Love, because no fathers, so little baby girls will age to 25 and then their human skin will fall-off and the demon-form that sickened and ate her soul with psycho-0cnt mom's help will walk among-us and be as accepted as our mothers killing our babies is accepted today.
No, the medieval witch trials were not legitimate. Women could not curdle milk in the cow, cause a baby to die with spells or control the weather. The Malleus Maleficarum was written by two angry incels with active imaginations and zero understanding of the Scientific Method (although in their defence it wouldn't be invented for another century or so).
But...plenty of men are involved in this genderfuck insanity so let's give credit where credit is due. and the 40% false rape allegation is delusional.
There's a lot of moral sickness going around, and *no one* is immune.
Do you hope we can all #BelieveWomen when good police investigations find that over 40% are shown as false-rape allegations, which is the low number - the police cannot prove false when she accuses because of regret, punishment, alibi for infidelity, or any of the many that come down to 'She accuses, he claims she consented.' [See other comment for study citation]
We can look at mothers' life-crippling lies to all family and real father, all the people she professes to 'love', with parental fraud at 1/3 - 1/3 children are bastards ..
"The only significant insight into the number of paternity fraud victims
comes from the American Associations of Blood Banks which, year after
year, reports that approximately twenty-eight percent of all paternity tests
exclude the targeted man. [51]"
51. American Association of Blood Banks Annual Report Summary for 1999 reports that “the overall exclusion rate for 1999 was 28.2% for accredited labs.” Id. at 4. The Annual Report Summary for testing in 2003 reports that, “For the laboratories tracking exclusions, there were 353,387 cases completed and 99,174 (28.06%) were reported as exclusions.” Id. at 4. See also, Tresa Baldas, Parent Trap? Litigation Explodes over Paternity Fraud, NAT’L L.J., Apr. 10, 2006 (“According to a recent study in New Hampshire, as many as 30 percent of those paying child support are not the biological fathers of the children being supported.”)
Parental fraud is different from false rape allegations.
Women that will lie life-crushing lies to everyone she professes to 'love' at rates of 1/3 mothers and so 1/3 of women in Parental Fraud, we should still believe that kind of vile-lying-backstabbing species about rape-accusations targeting not a 'loved' one, but some man she would likely and often does send to hell for the rest of his life for .. some kind of sick inhuman driven craving for crushing a life because maybe she doesn't have one of our son's unborn baby to torture to death?
So, and personal experiences are that too many I suffered .. if they were men and decent men would throw him off a building because that level of putrid vileness is a person is a danger to us all. And so, because it's a woman we let such live-one with tasering them till pissing and screaming in public and throwing in jail for 2+ years?
Let's unLovingly ignore such dangerous evil?
I'm curious as to what you think about my suggestion on your other comment speculating that men could start suing women for rape allegations unsupported by a police report or evidence. As I write this I consider that it could cut down on problems like the Substack writer rape allegation because, if a woman tries to shame a man or ruin his career publicly, he may have recourse to sue her. (Hmmmm....I may have an article idea here!) It would hold women more accountable for their unsupported allegations (I won't call them lies unless it's demonstrated it was, or she admits it...I believe a lot of those women are telling the truth but they still need to handle it responsibly from a legal standpoint), and also teach them that they have to report even if they don't pursue anything for the moment, if ever. Of course, women could file false reports with the police so they can cover themselves later and I don't have an answer to that yet. But, food for thought. What do you think? You're a very angry man about this and I get it. What can you/we do to rectify these injustices against men?
Correct, if the police only found that a little more then 40% of the filed rape accusations were false in those 3 years, then surely it is higher when no physical proof exists.
Thank you for pointing that out, but I figure you and readers would know.
Where did the police find 40% of filed rape allegations were false? Where did this happen? Where does this information come from?
.
Kanin, E. J., “False Rape Allegations,” 23 Archives of Sexual Behavior 1 (1994)
https://archive.org/stream/FalseRapeAllegations/false-rape-allegations-archive_djvu.txt
.
McNamara, J. and Lawrence, J., False Allegations of Adult Crimes, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (2012)
[FBI Web links broken, not suspicious!]
https://lasdisidentes.com/2013/04/24/false-allegations-of-adult-crimes-by-james-mcnamara-m-s-and-jennifer-lawrence-m-a
Archived: https://archive.ph/se1Pw
.
McDowell, C., “False Allegations,” 11 Forensic Science Digest, NO. 4, (Dec. 1985) p. 64 U.S. Air Force, Office of Special Investigations, Washington, D.C.
.
Related,, and referenced:
-
https://falseallegations.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/21
Archived: https://archive.ph/3BWb6
.
https://ncfm.org/2017/07/news/uncategorized/ncfm-false-rape-accusation-update
https://archive.ph/SszMv
.
Shit, I just spent like half an hour typing a reply to this and then accidentally shut down the tab. I do wish Substack would warn you about that when you're in the middle of a comment. Anyway, to sum up...I checked out your articles and briefly, the Kanin article is very old and cites very old research that doesn't really hold up any more...mostly because of age and dated rape investigation techniques. Another article said that '41%' of rapes were reported from a sample in a 'small metropolitan area', and not all were proven rapes. I should note that *my* definition of a false rape is one that has been demonstrated to be false or the victim finally admits she made it up. I know that false rapes happen; i've known two women who did lie, one of whom lied about two different men. I collect genuine false rape stories to challenge feminists when needed; your article about the situation between McNamara and Lawrence will get added, but still, not proof of the high number of false allegations. The best one you had was the last one from 2017 and, I admit, a little suspicious coming from a men's right's activist group but still, the article was interesting. However, once again, it can't make a good case for a hard and fast 40% of false allegations. They're often found to be 'unfounded' which still isn't proof. The numbers I've usually seen 2%-10% - may in fact be higher but the standard should be proof that the woman lied, and also, some guy got accused. Like the poor schmuck in the U of VA false rape case.
There are a lot of allegations of rape made well after the fact and to those I shrug and say, maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. A few years ago someone made such an allegation about a prominent Substack writer here and I investigated it and wrote about it but I couldn't determine whether she was telling the truth or not, but she still did some harm to this guy without a police report or any evidence. I've often said that women need to preserve the evidence at the time - if they decide to report later, they'll be in a better position than if they just come forward and fill out a report with no evidence. If women want rape victims to be taken more seriously, they're simply going to have to report at the time and if nothing is done about it, that's on the police.
I'm not convinced the false rape rate is that high but the last article, anyway, provided some food for thought and I thank you. I've written about false allegations before (and false false allegations re the feminist deniers of the Hamas mass rapes on Oct 7) and if there's newer evidence that the rape rate is higher than we think, *with evidence*, I want to know about it. I do believe women who lie about rape should be punished as seriously as convicted rapists.
Sorry about that loss of work. I moved from mainframe computer programming to IBM-PC & clones back in mid-1980 when automatic saves did not exist because most files saved on a floppy-drive and slow, pausing entire computer, and no battery back-up and system would reboot on the near-by co-workers flatulence, so .. freq. manual back-up and go pee or watch the giant Cain toads that we kept in lab to get the muscles from, for research ..
(but NOT for toad licking!)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cane_toad#Defences
--
About delayed accusations. The law should be if not reported with 6 months it is assumed false witnessing, and some significant punishment. Also, not shielding accuser and her victim only made public with her - predator's name included, and only if more then only her testimony as proof. And 'rape kits' are not so named, they are 'had sex kits' and do not prove rape.
--
The Farce of Justice Kavanaugh rape-accusation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brett_Kavanaugh#Sexual_assault_allegations
--
and Canadian Politian Patric Brown after he won his party's run-off and was falsely accused to remove him and allow the meritless Losser women take his place, his entire life has been covered in female-lying feces so some waaman could run for PM ..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Brown_(Canadian_politician)#Sexual_misconduct_allegations_and_resignation
He was forced to drop-out even those she had no proof.
--
But women that will lie life-crushing lies to everyone she professes to 'love' at rates of 1/3 mothers and so 1/3 of women in Parental Fraud, we should still believe that kind of vile-lying-backstabbing species about rape-accusations targeting not a 'loved' one, but some man she would likely and often does send to hell for the rest of his life for .. some kind of sick inhuman driven craving for crushing a life because maybe she doesn't have one of our son's unborn baby to torture to death?
So, and personal experiences are that too many I suffered .. if they were men and decent man would throw him off a building because that level of putrid vileness in a person is a danger to us all. And so because it's a woman we let such live-one with tasering them till pissing and screaming in public and throwing in jail for 2+ years?
Let's unLovingly ignore such dangerous evil?
From wikipedia "Drag is a performance of exaggerated femininity, masculinity, or other forms of gender expression, usually for entertainment purposes.".
My problem with drag for kinds is the exaggeration of gender expression. I think kids should learn/internalise the non-exaggerated gender expressions before they can be introduced to the exaggerations. If they are constantly exposed to the exaggerations before they have a stable core of normal gender expressions, they will have an impression that you need to do those exaggerated expression to be that gender and thus gender identity crysises might happen and they might think that their gender does not match the sex because they don't do those exaggerated gender expressions. Thus the modest gender expressions dissapear.
I don't have a problem with a man wearing modest dresses or skirts and just reading a story without needing to point out to their gender expression. Basically being a man who just happen to wear a skirt. And heck In eastern cultures men wear skirt looking stuff like sarong and no one bats an eye there.
Though my confusion might also stem from my lack of gender identity and it not making sense to me. I don't get why one behaviour/look is deemed feminine while another is deemed as masculine. I see both being able to be done by both males and females. Especially when things change over time, like a few hindreds years ago pink was boys colour while blue was girls colour.
And i think drag kings are ignored as they don't garner much outrage/attention due to masculinity in females being so accepted that people usually don't bat an eye on it. While femininity in males is still seen as outrageous.
I also kinda don't get the whole "perverts in toilet" stuff as there can also be same sex perverts. There is also a dilemma of being a parent with a small child of the opposite sex, do you bring your child to your sex toilet or to their sex toilet? So i am for gender neutral toilets.
We need a major correction - world-wide, and if it takes WWIII nuke war killing 3+ billions to break the insanity and Satanic hold on the survivors -that is as acceptable as the est. 3+ billions of our aborted daughters and sons world-wide in my lifetime. And a Just sacrifice in balance of dead born to match the silently screaming tortured to death unborn in my life.
Before Modernist anchorless deconstruction of sanity started there was St. Thomas Aquinas and other Theologians explaining in rational terms why sin damages the intellect, judgement, prudence, memory, .. the lie that the evil is good cripples us.
So, if sin retards and twists our minds, how much more does being forced from crib to accept the insanities of today as acceptable, even praiseworthy? We are all mind-raped and every generation is more evil-blinded, sexual mutilation of children is Ok, what next? Support of 16 moths of mass murder genocide in middle east?
Back in sane times the wise and experienced knew that what you did in private can hurt us all, and disOrdered perversions seem okay, then turn into almost naked men with strap-ons reenacting demonic-sickening acts in public, in our and children's faces and if a mob rightly publicly hangs them all, the Satanic State and rabid baby-murdering insane women seek to kills them, instead of only the daily crushing of gonads the hating-horrors find acceptable.
Our world in so Sickening Feminized only the death of 3+ billions can break the demonic possession of our putrid-rotted soul womanhood, gov., schools, ... Let them burn, burn, nuke-fire burn - to break the insanity.
Drag Queen reading to children - 30 years ago or whenever first suggested was the time to chain those witches to all the adults in their blood-line and dragged to gobs of not-silent scream flesh in public, or was in 60 years ago needed?
If not, how to stop this slide into hell were dead by nukes better for us and our children then another year of you hate-filled joy-love-hope murdering drive deeper into your psychotic Hell?
We may get the 'correction' sooner than you expect (watch for my article on The Fourth Turnign next week). It may well be global war, or thermonuclear war...I'd really it rather not be the latter two, as a lot of needless decent, innocent lives will be taken. I don't know how it's going to end but the next several years are going to be pretty rough for sure.
BTW the 'masculinized' world we've been living in for the past 12,000 years hasn't worked so well either...so, maybe the peace that comes after the crisis could incorporate more of both? No one group should be allowed to run the whole damn world--and that includes the Penis Brigade which is done a downright gawdawful job of engineering a world that works best for men. How about a world in which people take responsiblility for themselves as well as others?
Good points, all. I think drag kings are also ignored for the same reason transmen garner only a small fraction of the attention transwomen do: They're a lot less controversial and they tend not to recruit and indoctrinate children. I think a lot of them also were just trying to avoid living female in a misogynist world (a very bad reason, but whatever) and don't have a political motivation.
A lot of transactivists very much have a political motivation: Destroying women's right to say no to male sexual pleasure.
I'd rather have third toilets. Yeah, there are gay molesters (it happened to a friend of mine when he was a kid) but allowing men into women's rooms on the false pretense that 'they're women now' gives female-attracted sex offenders an excuse to be there.
It's an interesting quandary for certain. There are so many layers of culture and belief slurried on top that it's super hard to have a rational conversation.
“The overly inclusive progressive movement can’t say no to anyone.” Thank you. This pretty much says it all. What has happened to subtlety of thought? Why is everything so black and white? Why can’t more people support people with differences without putting them on a pedestal as victims of oppression? Why can’t other people be tolerant of others without demonizing them? Why does one side, as you have pointed out, say yes to everyone and everything, while the other side says no to everything and everyone?
Are humans as a whole even capable of balance? I wonder.