Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rainbow Medicine-Walker's avatar

Obviously Buffy lied. The birth certificate is pretty compelling proof. Based on our determinations today of who is considered native and who is not, she most definitely is not. However, based on older ancestral determinations of tribal membership, she wouild likely have been considered indian regardless of her ethnicity, if she was adotped in. When the US government forced enrollment and blood quantum on the tribes, they disallowed adoption for tribal membership. Indian identity has been a complex and highly charged issue in native america basically since the first mixed blood baby was born and the first 'non-native' was adopted in. I think you handled the subject matter well, even though I have a different perspective. I have been a legally enrolled and registered member of a federally recognized native american tribe for over fifty years. Here in America, 'Indian' is a legally defined, but not specifically a racially defined, term. Most tribal governments now insist that only those who are enrolled in federally recognized tribes can legally call themselves indians or native american. This is understandable, but there are also multiple problems with drawing this particular line in the sand. I would have to write several pages of well documented history here to explain exactly why this is a problem, but suffice it to say this issue of native ethnicity/idenity is not nearly as cut and dried as it would first appear or as many would like it to be. Indian america itself has been in an identity crises for multiple generations as well over 80% of us are now significantly mixed blood. The pure blood native phenotype has mostly disappeared in america, and many who appear 'full blood' are actually mixed blood hispanic, philipino, arab, black, iltalian, jewish, etc. Being indian is just not a reliable DNA thing. And so wierdly enough, some natives have actually created a checklist about what it means to be indian today. I guess they did this so we can tell ourselves and each other how we are supposed to act and think if we are to be seen as 'real' indians now. Many tribal elders would not be able to satisfy the new 'woke' indian identity requirements. So that tells you something right there. Our tribes are now infested with wokeness from all the young bright natives with shiny new degrees from all these woke colleges. It's hard to watch the fallout. There now seems to be some strange idea that all us indians were fully and accurately documented. Almost every single native elder I have ever known talked about innaccuracies in the documentation of their own families. For example my own native grandfather was officially enrolled with a different blood quantum than his full siblings who all had the same parents and that was a realtively small and common type of error. Like many things, we want the native identity issue to be black and white. or red and white as the case may be, but it isn't. Many tribes have kicked out lifetime enrolled members for various reasons many times. So one day you are indian and the next you are not?

Like everything else it is a politcal shell game and it is all about the money. I am not defending Buffy here, just attempting to show another side to this convoluted issue of who is indian and who is not.

Expand full comment
HeartOpen's avatar

A family can legally or emotionally adopt you, but it doesn't give you their ethnicity or heritage. You might feel that you share it, but it's still technically "honourary" heritage.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts